Report
on the first National Conference on Socialist Feminism (1975)
(Editors
Note: This is a 1975 report on the Socialist Feminist Conference
held in Yellow Springs OH. The Conference raised hopes that socialist
feminism would grow and prosper.)
It's
been just one month since over 1500 women from all over the country
met in Yellow,Springs, Ohio, to discuss theory, strategy, and practice
for the women's movement. A lot happened!
There were over 100 special interest workshops which dealt with
topics ranging from Women in Prisons to Women in Guinea Bissau
to Nonsexist Teaching in Elementary
School to Women Filmmakers. Over one-half of the women attended strategy sessions
in workplace and community organizing sharing practice from hospital work,
rape lines, schools,
union organizing, welfare rights organizations child care centers, and housing
campaigns. Other women talked about working with the mixed left, about how
to build women's organizations, and ways of developing a women's culture.
A central issue raised at the conference was the question of
how to build a multi-racial movement.. A Third World. caucus formed
and presented a statement
to the conference
as a whole and to a panel representing the Black, Chicana, Puerto Rican,
and Asian communities. Madonna Gilbert of the American Indian Movement
(AIM) also
spoke to the conference about the crisis at the Pine Ridge reservation. Other
panels dealt with socialist feminist theory, the economy, and lesbian women,
including a presentation from the CWLU Lesbian workgroup.
What did it all mean? What did the conference tell us about where
the women's movement is at nationally? What did we see as its strengths
and its weaknesses
as reflected in the conference? What are the major political questions
confronting the women's movement?
Those of us who helped plan the conference feel that we're not
yet able to answer those questions in a clear way. But we think
that a political
assessment
is crucial.
Many of the women who went from Chicago are doing evaluations. All of
the socialist feminist study groups set up for the conference have
met, as
well as the CWLU
Steering Committee. Chapters and workgroups have had their own summaries.
Both the New American Movement (NAM) and Rising Up Angry are talking
about it with
their own members.
Conference Followup
We are planning a Conference Followup for Sunday, August 17,
to continue this political assessment. The meeting is open any
woman
who attended
the conference
and to women who, were not able to go because of enrollment-limitations..
It will be held at the Puerto Rican High School, at 1520 N. Claremont
(I block
east of Western and I block south of North Avenue), from 9:30 A.M. to
5:00-P.M.
The meeting will focus both on the key political issues that
were raised at the conference and the meaning of the conference
to future women's
organizing in
Chicago. Evaluation and discussion questions (to be used in preparation
for the meeting) ,are being sent to conference participants, or you
can pick
up
a copy
at the office.
Childcare will be provided. Bring a lunch for yourself.
Fundraising for the Conference
Expenses for the CWLU and the conference planners from Chicago
totaled over $700! Please volunteer to be on a fundraising committee
which
will be set
up on the
17th. We're also-going to take donations that day, so bring along a
little bit extra.
Some Special Thanks
We appreciate all of the hard work which many women put in during
the weeks before the conference, but special thanks go to Judy
M., Pam
Z., and Della
L.,who handled
all of the registration and transportation. And also to the CWLU staff,
who had to put up with a million extra phone calls and interruptions.
IMPRESSIONS OF THE CONFERENCE
CWLU NEWS asked members who attended different of the workshops
at
the conference to write up their personal impressions. More analytical
and In-depth reporting will come out of the August 17 meeting. Be sure
to attend!
Organizing the Unorganized
Over 75 women attended strategic workshops on organizing unorganized
women.The women that came were mostly hospital,clerical, and childcare
workers. Although
most of the women were involved in regular unionization drives at
their workplaces, there was a good deal of discussion about additional
forms
of organization
which support the union organizing. Both childcare workers and hospital
workers are
developing ways to make links to the communities that they serve.
One model discussed was BADWU (Boston Area Daycare Workers Union)
which
has members
drawn from parents,
the community, and childcare workers at a variety of different centers.
In both Chicago and. New York, feminist office worker organizations
(Women Employed
and
9 to 5) support and often pave the way for unionization among clerical
workers. (Reported by Diane H) .
Education Workers
The direction of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) was
the main issue of this workshop. A thorough report from a member
of People
Against
Racism
in Education, from New York City, gave a graphic picture of the conservative
and
reactionary direction the union is heading under the leadership of
Albert Shanker. Increasing undemocratic procedures, the rise of racism
(particularly
in hiring
practices and in the teachers union's relationship to Third World
communities), a lack of emphasis on women's rights, and strict, top-down
bureaucratic
control were seen in all of the locals represent ed by conference
participants. The
workshop was just beginning to get into how to combat this trend--sharing
practice on
developing rank-and-file caucuses, women's committees, and teacher-community
alliances--when time was up.
There were a number of women from Chicago present, representing
substitute teacher organizing, GED (high school equivalency teacher
organizing,
and both teachers
unions--Local 1 and Local 1600. The workshop made clear the need
for national communication among socialists working in the union!
(Reported by Diane H)
Women in Prison
Prison Project convened a two-part workshop on Women in Prison,
around the relationship of prisons to the struggles and concerns
of the
women's movement
and around concrete
problems of doing political work in prisons and in the community.
Workshop discussions were great; a strong sense of shared direction
and that
we face similar contradictions
around our work. A national newsletter is planned to help continue
discussion, We came back re-energized There's a lot of work to
be done and we need
more women to help do it. Please call us if You are interested.
(Reported by The Prison
Project.)
Lesbian Organizing Strategy
Women from about fifteen cities participated this workshop.,
All regions of the country were represented, and the cities ranged
from large metropolitan
areas
to medium sized rural cities, to university towns. We discussed
in-depth how
our organizing efforts were influenced by our environment. The
women from New York City, Chicago, and Berkeley-Oakland had several
different
lesbian
and/or
socialist-feminist organizations to work with. However, we all
have difficulties, in moving from organizing the smaller base of
political
lesbians to
doing outreach in the broad, nonpolitical lesbian community. We
discussed the
different programs
that we had developed--newsletters, sports teams, consciousness
raising groups-and their strengths and weaknesses.
Lesbians from Atlanta, Georgia, talked about their experiences
in organizing gay women through sports leagues. A lot of lesbians
played
on mixed (gay
and straight) softball teams, but most of them were "in the
closet." In
1973 and 1974, gay women started to.form their own teams, sponsored
by the, gay bars. The Atlanta Lesbian Feminist Alliance(ALFA)
grew out of there sports teams. ALFA is not a political organization,
although some of its members are socialist feminists. ALFA has
organized gay women
around support work for the ERA and has monthly membership programs,.
as well as social
activities.
Women from Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Rochester, New York, talked
about their experiences organizing lesbians in a university atmosphere.
People in college
towns are looser
about politics and there is generally less "queer fear" than
in other environments. This makes it a lot easier to have open
gay meetings, centers,
dances, or coffeehouses. However, there is the traditional split
between "town
and gown" that carries over into the lesbian community. Older
gay women, or younger lesbians who are not affiliated with the
university, are suspicious
of the radical student lesbians. There is very little intermingling
or communication between the two groups. So far, there has been
no program or issue that has united
the two distinct communities that exist in both towns.
There were lesbians from many other cities who attended the workshops
to find out what was going on in other areas of the country. They
did not
have any
lesbian organizing experience, but were interested in trying to
begin to build outreach
programs in their cities. In order to give each, other support
in expanding existing organizing efforts, or in building new ones,
we
decided to
correspond regularly.
We will exchange newsletters, but we will also write personal letters
describing our experiences and talk about issues in our cities.
We will give each
other feedback and support in our work through a national communications
network.
There was a real sense of sadness when our time ran out on Sunday.
We met for three hours and felt that there was so-much more to
be said and
shared.
We
all felt a remarkable sense of closeness and sisterhood that gave
us real up feeling.
Most of us felt that this workshop was the highlight of our conference.
We spent an hour at the end talking, about our personal lives and
experiences. This mutual
sharing cemented the bond of support-that had been built during-the
two sessions.
We all decided that "Sisterhood does feel good!" (Reported
by Eileen W.)
Health Organizing
Discussion of health issues at the conference suffered from the
initial division of the strategy work shops into community and
workplace
organizing. There
are enough problems in trying to bridge that gap strategically
without compounding them by separating the two groups of organizers.
However,
one of the most
exciting
discussions of health issues came in the community organizing health
workshops on Saturday afternoon. After a series of presentations
from Healthright
(NY), the Santa Cruz Women's Health Collective, and HERS, women
from different parts of the country began to focus on exactly those
strategic
questions
of building
bridges between healthworkers and community people actively organizing
around
health issues . This is an area into which the women's health movement
has never moved successfully, and which seems important for the
application of
socialist
feminism to health issues.
The other community organizing health workshop was less successful
despite a useful presentation from a representative of the Fritzi
Engelstein People's Health
Center. Women active around health issues meet so infrequently
(even on a citywide,let alone a regional or national basis), that
it was
hard--and
maybe
not correct
to try to steer discussion away from nitty-gritty problems of financing
and women' clinics etc., to broader questions.
Possibly the most important part of the conference, for health
people, turned out to be the workshop given by the New York Committee
to
End Sterilization Abuse. The room was packed, and as the New York
women
gave specific details
about their
work, women from Seattle, Boston, Vancouver, and other cities added,".
pieces to the national and international pattern of abuse which
emerged. This should
be an important
focus for the socialist feminist women's health movement nationally.
Work in Chicago on the issue is already becoming an important part
of the followup
of the conference.
(Reported by Jenny K. and Lauren C. )